• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

Johns Hopkins Arthritis Center

Show Search
Hide Search
  • Disease Information
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Ankylosing Spondylitis
    • Osteoarthritis
    • Gout
    • Osteoporosis
  • Patient Corner
    • Drug Information Sheets
    • Managing Your Arthritis
    • RheumTV – Patient Education Video Library
  • Our Research
    • Patient-Centered Outcomes Research
    • Current Research Studies
    • The Camille Julia Morgan Arthritis Research and Education Fund
  • About Us
    • Appointment Information
    • Contact Us
    • Our Faculty
    • Our Staff
    • Rheumatology Specialty Centers
  • Donate
Home / Arthritis News / Osteoarthritis News / Study Finds No Treatment Benefit of Intra-Articular Anakinra in Knee Osteoarthritis

Study Finds No Treatment Benefit of Intra-Articular Anakinra in Knee Osteoarthritis

May 20, 2009 By Arthritis Center

Anakinra (Kineret)
Anakinra (Kineret)

Inflammatory cytokines, in particular IL-1, are elevated in the synovial fluid of patients with knee osteoarthritis (OA); however, their contribution to OA symptoms and damage are unclear.  A small study (n=13) in which the IL-1 inhibitor anakinra was injected into the knee of OA patients suggested a possible benefit on pain and function.  Here, Chevalier et al (Arthritis Rheum 2009; 61(3): 344) report the short-term efficacy of intra-articular anakinra on knee OA symptoms in a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial.

Methods

Adults with painful radiographic tibiofemoral knee OA that was not end-stage were randomized to receive anakinra (150 mg or 50mg) or placebo, randomized in a 2:1:2 fashion.  Patients received a blind injection of study drug into the index knee.  The primary study outcome was change in knee symptoms, measured using the pain, stiffness, and physical function subscales of the WOMAC, 4 weeks after injection.  Other outcomes included pain VAS, the amount of rescue analgesia used, serum and urine biomarkers of collagen synthesis and degradation at weeks 4 and 12 after injection, and safety.  A subset of subjects had serum pharmacokinetic analysis.

Results

A total of 170 subjects were enrolled (n=69 to placebo, n=34 to anakinra 50mg, n=67 to anakinra 150 mg) with 160 (94%) completing the study.  No withdrawals were secondary to adverse events.  Study subjects were predominantly female (63%), Caucasian (88%), with a mean age of 63 years and a mean duration of OA of 6 years.  The majority of patients (58%) had advanced radiographic knee OA (Kellgren/Lawrence grade 3) with a wide variability in WOMAC scores reported.

All groups had decreases in total and subscale WOMAC scores at all time points of the study; however, there were no statistically significant differences between the three study groups at any time point.  There was a trend to significance between the placebo group and the anakinra 150 mg group in pain at day 4 associated with an approximately 50 unit difference in the decrease in WOMAC pain score favoring the anakinra 150 mg group (p=0.051).  There were no significant differences in quality of life measures or use of analgesics between the three groups.  Serum anakinra concentrations leveled off at two days post-injection and decreased thereafter, with a terminal half-life of 4 hours.  Injection site reactions were observed as frequently in the placebo group as in the anakinra groups.  Adverse and serious adverse events were balanced between the groups, although non-serious infections were more frequent in the anakinra 150 mg group compared to the placebo or anakinra 50 mg groups (18% vs. 6% and 3%, respectively.

Conclusions

A single intra-articular injection of anakinra was not more efficacious than placebo in decreasing the signs and symptoms of painful knee OA.

Editorial Comment

The search for effective disease modifying agents for OA has remained elusive.  The apparent importance of IL-1 in the pathophysiologic mechanism of cartilage damage in OA, coupled with suggestive animal studies with IL-1 inhibition, held promise that IL-1 inhibition may be an effective treatment strategy for human OA.  What are some of the reasons for the lack of efficacy observed in this study other than a true lack of effect?  One possibility is that a single intra-articular injection is not enough exposure to IL-1 inhibition to expect results, particularly as the drug does not appear to concentrate within the joint.  Another is that IL-1 inhibition may be required much earlier in the disease process, before significant cartilage damage has occurred, as it is unlikely that IL-1 inhibition will promote repair.  Recent investigations have linked pain in knee OA not to cartilage, but to subclinical synovitis and bone marrow edema.  It is possible that the early difference in pain responses favoring the high dose anakinra group observed in this study could have been related to effects of IL-1 inhibition on synovitis.  However, similar effects would likely have been observed with intraarticular glucocorticoids, which have a longer track record of use and are much less expensive.  Whether repeated intraarticular injections of anakinra are efficacious requires further investigation; however, the logistics of repeated administration may not be feasible.

Receive the Latest News from Johns Hopkins Rheumatology

Receive the Latest News from Johns Hopkins Rheumatology

Join our mailing list to receive the latest news and updates from Johns Hopkins Rheumatology.

Interested In

You have Successfully Subscribed!

Arthritis Center

Founded in 1998, the Arthritis Center at Johns Hopkins is dedicated to providing quality education to patients and healthcare providers alike.

Use of this Site

All information contained within the Johns Hopkins Arthritis Center website is intended for educational purposes only. Physicians and other health care professionals are encouraged to consult other sources and confirm the information contained within this site. Consumers should never disregard medical advice or delay in seeking it because of something they may have read on this website.

Primary Sidebar

Recent News

Exercise Tips for Arthritis Patients

How Does Exercise Affect my Joints? How Frequently Should I Be Exercising? Should I Lose Weight for Exercise to be

Risks and Benefits of Biologic Medications

Victoria Ruffing, RN, BC, Director of Patient Education at the Johns Hopkins Arthritis Center, shares the risks and benefits of biologic for

How to Manage Rheumatoid Arthritis Flares

Through research, doctors have a clearer understanding of how flares can impact a patient on a personal and emotional level. Dr. Uzma Haque

Complementary & Alternative Medicines for Psoriatic Arthritis

There are many complementary & alternative medicines and practices that have been found to be beneficial in curbing arthritis pain,

I can’t be a runner because I have Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA), right?

Dr. Manno discusses running and Rheumatoid Arthritis. Is it an option for the RA patient?

News Categories

  • Ankylosing Spondylitis News
  • Fibromyalgia News
  • Gout News
  • Lupus News
  • Osteoarthritis News
  • Osteoporosis News
  • Psoriatic Arthritis News
  • Rheumatoid Arthritis News
RheumTV Logo

Rheum.TV is an informational platform created to educate patients living with a rheumatic disease. With over 100 disease education videos produced by the team at Johns Hopkins Rheumatology.

Visit Rheum.TV

Footer

Johns Hopkins Rheumatology

  • Johns Hopkins Rheumatology
  • Johns Hopkins Lupus Center
  • Johns Hopkins Lyme Disease Research Center
  • Johns Hopkins Myositis Center
  • Johns Hopkins Scleroderma Center
  • Johns Hopkins Sjögren’s Syndrome Center
  • Johns Hopkins Vasculitis Center

Connect With Us

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Johns Hopkins Medicine

© 2023 Johns Hopkins Arthritis Center
Patient Privacy